THE SEISMIC RESPONSE OF CONCENTRICALLY BRACED MOMENT-RESISTING STEEL FRAMES

Author(s):  
L. MARTINELLI ◽  
M. G. MULAS ◽  
F. PEROTTI
1993 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 672-687 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. K. Jain ◽  
R. G. Redwood ◽  
Feng Lu

Concentrically braced steel frames are one of the most commonly used structural systems because of their structural efficiency, simplicity to analyze and design, and ease of construction and repair. Canadian design codes provide specifications for their design under seismic loading based on the large amount of knowledge related to their seismic response accumulated over the past two decades. This paper examines the impact of a dual system with a moment resisting frame acting in parallel with the concentrically braced frame. Four different frames were designed in accordance with the National Building Code of Canada and CSA-S16.1-M89, and their inelastic responses are studied under the action of both monotonically increasing load and seismic load. The relative strengths and stiffnesses of the frames comprising the dual systems were varied. The ductility demands on members, and overall building deflections and storey drifts, were examined under the action of ten earthquake records. It is concluded that improved performance such as reduced ductility demand and improved uniformity of the distribution of yield throughout the structure can be achieved. However, the stiffness and strength in the moment resisting frame necessary to provide marked improvement must be a significant proportion of those of the braced frame. Key words: structural engineering, earthquakes, inelastic analysis, concentric bracing, dual system, steel, buckling.


Author(s):  
Brian M. Broderick ◽  
Jamie Goggins ◽  
Darko Beg ◽  
Ahmet Y. Elghazouli ◽  
Philippe Mongabure ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 338-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Tremblay ◽  
André Filiatrault ◽  
Peter Timler ◽  
Michel Bruneau

The performance of concentrically braced steel frames and moment resisting steel frames during the January 17, 1994, Northridge, California, earthquake is examined. Most of the observations made during the reconnaissance visits confirmed the current knowledge on the inelastic response of these structural systems. This permits the anticipation of proper seismic behavior for buildings designed according to the seismic provisions that have been recently introduced in the Canadian building code and standard for steel structures. In some cases, however, the observed damage raised concerns that should be addressed in future investigations or next editions of these codes. Preventing potentially hazardous nonstructural damage, avoiding premature nonductile failures anywhere along the lateral load paths, limiting structural and nonstructural damage due to brace buckling, and accounting for the vertical ground motion are among those issues. Key words: earthquake, seismic, steel, concentrically braced frames, moment resisting frames, weld.


1986 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 703-727 ◽  
Author(s):  
Egor P. Popov

A number of new code developments, largely initiated in California, are taking place in the USA for the seismic design of steel structures. The principal ones are reviewed and commented upon in the paper. Key experimental support for some of the changes is indicated. Major attention is directed to the three main types of steel construction: moment-resisting frames, concentrically braced steel frames, and, the relatively new method for seismic design, eccentric bracing. Some of the proposed and possible practical improvements in moment-resisting connections are given; the reasons for some concern over the use of concentrically braced frames for severe seismic applications are discussed; and a brief overview on the application of eccentrically braced steel frames is presented. The paper concludes with a few remarks on future trends and needs in structural steel seismic design.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document